Hi, Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2011, 12:22 +0530 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > Am Sonntag, den 27.03.2011, 07:47 +0100 schrieb Mark Hymers: > > On Sun, 27, Mar, 2011 at 10:06:54AM +0530, Joachim Breitner spoke thus.. > > > I guess the arch-any ghc6 packages are still in the archive, given that > > > they are owned by a different source package. Maybe one work-around > > > could be that ftp-master removes ghc6_7.0.2-7_all.deb, > > > ghc6-doc_7.0.2-7_all.deb and ghc6-prof_7.0.2-7_all.deb from the archive, > > > so that ghc will be built against the existing arch-any ghc6 packages. > > > > > > Dear ftp-team: Is that something you could do for us? > > > > I'm deeply unhappy with having to do this as it rewinds version history > > in unstable. However, given the situation you've landed in and after > > some discussion with Phil Kern, I don't see any sane alternatives. I > > haven't removed ghc6-doc as for technical reasons that would have also > > removed the .all deb from the older version. If it hadn't been for the > > fact that the any debs were still in the suite, this would have been a > > considerably bigger pain... > > Thanks a lot. I’m not happy about this either... and I thought I tested > the builds well enough in experimental. Status: The bad arch-all package is gone from the Packages list, but still present in incoming.debian.org, which is also considered by wanna-build and thus ghc is still in state BD-Uninstallable. We will have to wait for that package to leave incoming.d.o. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part