Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 10.02.2011, 10:18 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > There are some exceptions: There's no libghc-ghc-dev provided, but there is > libghc-ghc-dev-7.0.1-66fcc, the directory and the package. it might be that the ghc package is actually not something that should be relevant to anything outside ghc. That might be why igloo or kaol did not include libghc-ghc-dev in the provides, so maybe libghc-ghc-dev-7.0.1-66fcc should be removed. > There's no > libghc-rts-dev-VERSION-HASH, but there is libghc-rts-dev, the file > (instead of the directory) and the package. Not sure, but could be similar: Maybe no package ought to depend on the RTS package and therefore no Provides should be generated. > There's no libghc-utf8-string-dev-VERSION-HASH, nor directory, nor > package, but there's libghc-utf8-string-dev. utf8-string used to be provided by ghc and is not any more. Provide needs to be removed, and utf8-sting packaged on its own (again). > The same holds for xhtml. Same think I guess. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part