Hi, Am Montag, den 30.08.2010, 09:00 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani: > Il 22/08/2010 16:27, Joachim Breitner ha scritto: > > Hi, > > > > Am Mittwoch, den 04.08.2010, 19:53 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner: > >> pandoc-dev is currently uninstallable, due to the updated pandoc. Should > >> I binNMU pandoc 1.5.1.1 to fix this until you release the next version, > >> or are you just about to do so? > > > > FYI, I scheduled binNMUs to keep the packages in sid installable > > (https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pandoc) > > Now you should do the same for gitit, which is currently not > installable. Probably your script isn't able to catch it, because gitit > depends against pandoc out of the usual Haskell dependency system (as we > discussed time ago). done on amd64. i386 looked fine. Why exactly does gitit depend on pandoc? Does it need the exact version of the binary, or does it need some data which do not change during binNMUs? In the latter case, we should eventually (after squeeze, or in experimental) switch to a arch-all pandoc-data package, so that we do not have to rebuilt gitit just because pandoc was binNMUed. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part