Hi, Am Dienstag, den 30.03.2010, 08:07 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > (...) > > diff -rN -u old-haskell-llvm/libghc6-llvm-doc.doc-base new-haskell-llvm/libghc6-llvm-doc.doc-base > > Maybe we should get in a consensus about the policy of the group about the > doc-base files. From the suggestions we had in the other discussions, I tend > to agree with Joachim that only ghc6 should have it's doc-base entry or, if all > the packages are going to have it, it should be handled via > haskell-devscripts. So in both cases, there'll be no need to include this file > in the source package. Looking at file:///usr/share/doc/HTML/Programming/Haskell/index.html I really see little value in listing all libraries there, so unless there are arguments in favour of adding doc-base entries, I’d strongly recommend not having them for individual entries. > > diff -rN -u old-haskell-llvm/rules new-haskell-llvm/rules > (...) > > +DEB_BUILD_DEPENDENCIES = build-arch > > A question about PackageTemplate: isn't it better to include this line in > hlibrary.mk? Can it be re-set in debian/rules, if required? If in doubt, maybe Jonas can give us advice. @Erik, another question about haskell-llvm: How is it related with the llvm backend of ghc6? Is either required for the other? Are they totally independent? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part