Hi, Am Freitag, den 11.09.2009, 17:33 +1000 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 07:02:23AM +1000, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > > > This would suggest that we need a HaXmL1.13 and leave the current > > > HaxMl unchanged. > > > > I'm a bit puzzled why you want to declare all the current[*] haxml-using Debian > > packages buggy. > > I wasn't aware of a huge number of haxml-using Debian packages. Neither > it seem as apt-cache: > > sid > apt-cache rdepends haxml > haxml > Reverse Depends: > libhugs-haxml > libghc6-haxml-dev > > sid > apt-cache rdepends libghc6-haxml-dev > libghc6-haxml-dev > Reverse Depends: > |haxml > > On Debian Lenny I get: > > lenny > apt-cache rdepends haxml > haxml > Reverse Depends: > libhugs-haxml > libghc6-haxml-dev > > lenny > apt-cache rdepends libghc6-haxml-dev > libghc6-haxml-dev > Reverse Depends: > libghc6-happs-state-dev > libghc6-happs-state-dev > libghc6-happs-server-dev > libghc6-happs-server-dev > libghc6-happs-data-dev > libghc6-happs-data-dev > |haxml > > To me that looks like one package which seems to be unmaintained (hugs) > and happs. There are a few programs affected: $ grep-dctrl -F Build-Depends haxml < /var/lib/apt/lists/ftp2.de.debian.org_debian_dists_sid_main_source_Sources -s Package Package: darcs-monitor Package: hpodder Package: twidge Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil