Hi, Am Donnerstag, den 10.09.2009, 12:20 +0300 schrieb Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho: > > As such, I think the solution to this issue is to do a package named > HaXml1.13 > > and keep the HaXml package tracking the latest Hackage version. > > I'd recommend against that. There's no reason to continue breaking > existing > packages. The 1.19 version should be called haxml-devel, following > upstream's > lead. if it turns out that HaXml-1.19 is indeed a development version and not needed by anything in Debian, I’d suggest to just switch back to 1.13 (using an epoch version) and not package -1.19 until there is a good reason to do so, to reduce the amount of packages we have. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil