Re: haxml needs work

To: debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: haxml needs work
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+hs@mega-nerd.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:24:20 +1000
Message-id: <20090817082420.aa2d1bc9.mle+hs@mega-nerd.com>
Reply-to: debian-haskell@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20090817065029.ecb9f54e.mle+hs@mega-nerd.com>
References: <1250447138.5308.55.camel@localhost> <20090817065029.ecb9f54e.mle+hs@mega-nerd.com>

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:

> HaXml 1.19.7 was waiting for the polyparse package which has just hit
> unstable. I have a haskell-devscripts version of a 1.19.7 package 
> nearly ready to go.

Do we still need Hugs support in HaXml? What about Hugs support in
general.

I don't use Hugs myself and I know that not of the new packages I have
done have had the Hugs support. Should they have?

Opinions?

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/

Reply to:

References:
- haxml needs work
  - From: Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org>
- Re: haxml needs work
  - From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+hs@mega-nerd.com>

Prev by Date: Re: ∀lib: Debian(lib) >= Platform(lib)
Next by Date: Re: ∀lib: Debian(lib) >= Platform(lib)
Previous by thread: Re: haxml needs work
Next by thread: Re: haxml needs work
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread