Hi, Am Freitag, den 03.07.2009, 22:41 -0400 schrieb Ravi Nanavati: > On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 6:16 PM, Joachim Breitner<nomeata@debian.org> wrote: > > Of the four people that have commented, John and Ravi are in support of > > git, Marco prefers Darcs and I would have liked to try that as well, but > > I can also live with git. > > Actually, given that Marco has stepped up to take on darcs-based > infrastructure the way John did with git, I'd come down (mildly) on > the side of darcs (for the reasons I mentioned previously). That being > said, I'm pretty indifferent, so I'm happy to let people with stronger > opinions prevail. we could, for a short amount of time (maybe until during DebConf) use either, some packages in darcs and some in git, and then make a more educated decision. Or is that overkill? Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil