[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: I'd like to help out.



On Thu, 19 Mar 2009, Trent W. Buck wrote:

That may be fine for a third-party repo, but when I last looked at the
results (perhaps a month ago) from the cabal-debian in hackage, ISTR
they were full of lintian errors and warnings.  For example, ISTR the
package descriptions of the -doc and -prof packages did not reproduce
the long description, they merely all had the same string along the
lines of

   This is documentation for libghc6-<package>-dev.

I also looked at the Darcs repository for cabal-debian, but I couldn't
get that to work at all.

So while I think this work is a good starting point, I strongly feel
that there is a long way to go before it could be used for official,
policy-compliant Debian packages.

Would it be feasible to organise things so that the official Debian packages are maintained as patches to the output of cabal-debian? This should help with some of the tedious update tracking and could make the jump from unofficial auto-generated package to official Debian package less painful.

Ganesh


Reply to: