[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GHC 6.10.1 uploaded to experimental



Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 03.02.2009, 18:54 -0200 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
Silva:
> I just noticed that I've made a patch here, to add in the next upload.
> I think it's better than using || true, what do you think?
> 
>         ${GHC_PKG} describe @PKG@-@VERSION@ &> /dev/null \
>             && ${GHC_PKG} unregister @PKG@-@VERSION@

not sure if it’s better.

What do you gain:
If there is a sever problem with your ghc-pkg data base, you might not
be able to remove haskell library packages.

What do you lose:
If there is a sever problem with your ghc-pkg data base, you might not
be able to remove haskell library packages.

:-)

It really depends on the situation in which this will actually make a
difference, and I can’t forsee them. 

But I do think that having the same scripts in all library packages is
worthwhile, so I’d suggest you use haskell-devscript’s script (or use
haskell-devscripts directly), and we can discuss if this script should
be improved.

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil


Reply to: