[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?


Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 19:03 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> > This is actually a neat idea to avoid the sourceful uploads that I
> > mentioned in my last mail: If the upcoming haskell-devscripts that will
> > move haddock files to -dev would depend on these five packages, it is no
> > problem if some haskell-* packages still list them as B-D-I, as they
> > have haddock as a B-D. 
> On the other hand, ghc6-doc, haddock and hscolour will be a B-D.
> This is not a problem if .haddock file gets to -dev, but it is if it
> don't.

not sure what you mean: B-D will be satisfied for both binary-indep and
binary-dep, i.e. always. It is only B-D-I that might be missing in some
cases (e.g. buildds). There is no Build-Depends-Dep.

Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: