Hi, Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 19:03 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e Silva: > > This is actually a neat idea to avoid the sourceful uploads that I > > mentioned in my last mail: If the upcoming haskell-devscripts that will > > move haddock files to -dev would depend on these five packages, it is no > > problem if some haskell-* packages still list them as B-D-I, as they > > have haddock as a B-D. > > On the other hand, ghc6-doc, haddock and hscolour will be a B-D. > This is not a problem if .haddock file gets to -dev, but it is if it > don't. not sure what you mean: B-D will be satisfied for both binary-indep and binary-dep, i.e. always. It is only B-D-I that might be missing in some cases (e.g. buildds). There is no Build-Depends-Dep. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil