Re: Should haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?
Hallo Joachim.
Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 22:59:29 +0200
Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> escreveu:
(...)
> Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 17:48 -0300 schrieb Marco Túlio Gontijo e
> Silva:
> > Em Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:30:04 +0200
> > Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> escreveu:
> > (...)
> > > haskell-devscripts, by default, build docs with hscolour. At the moment,
> > > every package needs a Build-Dependency on hscolour, despite actually
> > > mentioning it anywhere. Woudn’t it make more sense to have
> > > haskell-devscripts depend on hscolour?
> >
> > Isn't it the same with gch6, ghc6-prof, ghc6-doc and haddock? Should all of
> > them be a dependency?
>
> Hmm. Actually, yes :-)
(...)
> This is actually a neat idea to avoid the sourceful uploads that I
> mentioned in my last mail: If the upcoming haskell-devscripts that will
> move haddock files to -dev would depend on these five packages, it is no
> problem if some haskell-* packages still list them as B-D-I, as they
> have haddock as a B-D.
On the other hand, ghc6-doc, haddock and hscolour will be a B-D.
This is not a problem if .haddock file gets to -dev, but it is if it
don't.
Auf Wiedersehen.
--
marcot
http://marcot.iaaeee.org/
Reply to: