[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Moving libraries' .haddock files to -dev packages


Am Montag, den 20.07.2009, 23:30 +0300 schrieb Kari Pahula:
> Fortunately, all that's needed for this is a small change in
> haskell-devscripts.  I can NMU it (again) soon, along with uploading
> ghc6, unless someone wants to say something about this.

I should add that for all packages that have a
Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Indep split (includes Marcos package and
everyone’s who copied from him, i.e. mine :-)), a sourceful upload is
required, to put haddock, hscolour and ghc6-doc to B-D.

Kaol, how are you going to lay out your hlibrary.mk changes? Please keep
this (corner) use case in mind, where build-indep builds more than just
haddock files (e.g. a documentation written in latex) that should be
avoided on buildds. I guess you’ll want to introduce a new target
"haddock" or similar that is dependen on by both build/libghc6-*-doc:
and build/libghc6-*-dev:, still allowing build/libghc6-*-doc to do
additional stuff.


Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
Debian Developer
  nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Reply to: