Hi, Am Sonntag, den 19.07.2009, 00:26 +0100 schrieb Iain Lane: > I created a wiki page[0] to track our effort towards Haskell platform > compliance. This is only a first pass, and does not include issues such > as GHC porting, install/buildability and parsec related problems. If > anyone has such information, they are encouraged to update the page > accordingly. Thanks a lot, great (and good-looking) overview. I’ll have a closer look from DebCamp. Is this against 2009.2.0.2 or 2009.2.0.1 now? Please add that information to the page. Maybe it could be integrated into http://people.debian.org/~nomeata/hackagevsdebian.html adding a new column for the platform version (or versions, to get an overview about more than one platform version), for automatic updates. > I wonder if we shouldn't aim for 2009.2.0.2[1], though. It's very > unlikely that we're going to get all new packages in before this new > release anyway, and already some of our libraries are newer than what > 2009.2.0.1 asks for, yet at the correct version for 2.0.2. The notable > exceptions are the various regex packages, which seem to be on a pretty > old version. Don, can you shed some light here? Everyone, do you think > this is a good idea? The next version is due to freeze on July 31st and > release on August 13th. I agree with dons that going for 2009.2.0.2 makes more sense. @dons: Thx, by the way, for your following this and giving your advice. It is very appreciated. Greetings, Joachim -- Joachim "nomeata" Breitner Debian Developer nomeata@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C JID: nomeata@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil