Magnus Therning wrote: > On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Joachim Breitner <nomeata@debian.org> wrote: > [..] > >>> Am I correct in thinking that the amd64 build[3] failed because of >>> haddock? (haddock 2.4.1-1 is available in experimental amd64 now, so >>> what's keeping the system from making another attempt?) >> You are referring to: >> http://experimental.debian.net/build.php?&pkg=ghc6 >> >> Probably a full build queue for amd64, but that's just speculation. > > This is the response I got from Marc Brockschmidt: > > "The box crashed three times when actually trying to build ghc. > Pending further investigation, it's turned off." > > I'll have to wait a little longer for the goodness it seems :( Is there any other way of getting a binary build of 6.10 for amd64 into experimental (e.g. binNMU) or is waiting for the auto-builder the only way forward? I could build it myself, but then I'd also have to build all other libs. I'm assuming that the presence of a binary ghc6 in experimental would mean amd64 soon will catch up with i386 in number of available packages, right? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org http://therning.org/magnus Haskell is an even 'redder' pill than Lisp or Scheme. -- PaulPotts
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature