On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 09:11:16AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > Are you saying wait on *all* uploads, or just those going to t-p-u? In > any case, let me know when to proceed. Before anything, just to be certain, I'd wait until ghc6 gets built on arm and armel, too. Should be done tomorrow. Then, upload ldap-haskell, listlike, magic-haskell and washngo as usual to unstable. Ask to have them unblocked on debian-release (on IRC if you're in hurry), refer to #511756. > I'm a bit confused about the comment about the release team doing > source-only NMUs. Wouldn't that imply that I don't need to upload any > of my packages? Sorry, I think that I misspoke. It would be nice if RMs had magic RM powers that took care of this without further effort, but I don't know if they do. Failing that, there's what section 5.13.3. in the developer's reference says. I think the RMs know about this already and they don't need to be contacted before uploading to testing-proposed-updates. I'm hoping that just making sure that the built packages wouldn't pull in anything from unstable would be enough. If you want to be proper about it, set up a testing chroot. I sure hope that "After uploading and successful build on all platforms" implies that buildds work on t-p-u. Not my idea of fun, these kinds of updates... Ask if you want NMUs.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature