Re: new distribution
* trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com (trixter@0xdecafbad.com) wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-01-02 at 12:28 -0600, Chris Larson wrote:
> > * trixter http://www.0xdecafbad.com (trixter@0xdecafbad.com) wrote:
> > > Yeah but my problem is that I wanted something that works, and if you
> > > report a bug to people who are listed as responsible for that module you
> > > dont get a bunch of people saying that they are just volunteers and
> > > access to CVS ro so you cant submit fixes, etc..
> >
> > If you show yourself to be competent, you'll get write access,
> > whether it be to Opie cvs at handhelds.org, GPE cvs at handhelds.org, or
> > the OpenEmbedded repositories for distro things.
>
> lies! france has decided that I am not allowed to participate at all.
> competent or otherwise. his *sole* decision prevents me from staying on
> the mailing list, irc, etc.
My ignorance of france's decisions doesn't make it a lie, it makes it a
misunderstanding. Regardless, OE's metadata isn't even within his
control.
> If it werent for the work I did this week bluetooth on the 0.8 final for
> h5500 would still not function (it got broke *again* when it worked in
> 0.8-pre), some hardware wouldnt be supported, people would not be able
> to upgrade (familiar released several packages that werent tested so
> people have to patch their systems manually just to upgrade them), etc.
> This is not to say that someone would not have eventually figured it
> out, some of it was easy, and most people could have done it.
I'm proud of you. Was there a reason for this pointless shameless self
promotion?
> Additionally stuff that I have reported (as simple as a RDEPENDS change)
> is taking at least more than 2 weeks to fix (its still not fixed).
Reported via what means?
> > > Yes and there is a 'BootStrap' image that hh.org has its basically opie
> > > or gpe without a GUI (what makes opie opie and gpe gpe). But it would
> > > still be awkward to mount effectivly a root partition as a subdirectory
> > > somewhere to use it for document storage.
> >
> > I should correct a misconception here. Bootstrap is the distro without
> > a gui. It is not opie without a gui, because opie _is_ a gui. opie
> > without a gui is nothing.
>
> what misconception, other than the one you have about what I said? I
> even specifically said the gui is what makes opie opie or gpe gpe.
> personally I dont see a misconception on my part, but I do find it
> interesting that you have to correct me on this by basically saying I am
> wrong but saying the same thing as I said..
Bootstrap is not opie without opie. It is not gpe without gpe. It is a
distribution without either. How many times do you need me to fix your
terminology before it sinks in?
--
Chris Larson - kergoth at handhelds dot org
Linux Software Systems Engineer - clarson at ti dot com
OpenZaurus Project Maintainer - http://openzaurus.org/
Reply to: