[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: seeking feedback per unixcw v3.6.1-1



On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 11:15:14AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Federico Grau
> > Per the dropped "Provides: libcw6-dev", I was thinking this 3.6.1-1 ("trixie")
> > package would support an upgrade from 3.6.0-5 ("bookworm"), which provides
> > libcw-dev.  Not clear how this may be worded in the changelog, but certainly
> > support more information.  
> 
> If we want to clean up the unixcw packaging, we should move the
> /usr/share/man/man7/cw.7.gz manpage from libcwX to some other
> package. This would remove the need for newer libcwX packages to
> conflict with older sonames.

Oh, that's a good suggestion.  I propose to move it into the "cw" binary
package, but will hold off on the upload for a few days in case there
are other suggestions.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: