Re: seeking feedback per unixcw v3.6.1-1
Re: Federico Grau
> Per the dropped "Provides: libcw6-dev", I was thinking this 3.6.1-1 ("trixie")
> package would support an upgrade from 3.6.0-5 ("bookworm"), which provides
> libcw-dev. Not clear how this may be worded in the changelog, but certainly
> support more information.
If we want to clean up the unixcw packaging, we should move the
/usr/share/man/man7/cw.7.gz manpage from libcwX to some other
package. This would remove the need for newer libcwX packages to
conflict with older sonames.
Christoph
Reply to: