Le lundi 13 août 2007 à 06:00 -0700, Alex Malinovich a écrit : > But in the meantime, gnome-vfs is so bad that I find it hard to believe > that it's just an architectural thing and not a problem with how > something is configured. If it was just sloppy code I would expect to > either see my CPU usage go through the roof, or my bandwidth go through > the roof with retransmits while the actual USEFUL data coming across is > very low. But neither of these is the case. It's almost as though > someone decided to put a 10 MB/sec cap on all gnome-vfs data transfers, > which seems pretty crazy. The buffer size for the sftp and smb methods is hardcoded to 32 KiB, which seems really small. Given a round-trip time of a few milliseconds, 10 MB/s seem like a bandwidth you could obtain with such small buffers. You can try to increase the buffer size; I'm interested to know whether this improves anything. -- .''`. : :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code. `. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to `- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=