Re: do not delete gnome-1
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 10:37:41AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 07:56:41AM -0700, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> >> Josselin Mouette <joss@debian.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > I have repeatedly warned libpng2/libpng10 users that these packages
> >> > would have to be *removed* after the sarge release. Yes, removed.
> >>
> >> Well, you didn't warn me. You only warned primary users, not the
> >> secondary users. The secondary users are all the ones whose packages
> >> get uninstallable when libpng2/libpng10 goes away.
> >
> > Come on Thomas, we all knew about those problems since over a year
> > ago, if not more, when the primarily mess about the libpng multiple
> > incarnation hit the to-be stable of the time. So please stop
> > exchanging blames and critics, and let's try to be positive and go
> > forward with those problems.
>
> I knew about the multiple png problems. I didn't know the solution
> chosen (drop png2) was going to be implemented without warning, nor
> did I know that solution had been chosen.
Well, when we migrated away from the old one, it was common knoledge that we
would remove the old ones in the long run. I think i heard about this two
years ago first or something such.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: