Re: do not delete gnome-1
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005, Robert Hart wrote:
> I think there is a fine line between "encouraging gnucash to make the
> transition" and "forcing gnucash to do it now". I would hope the gnucash
> developers are well aware by now that GTK+1 is not a long term solution,
> but I don't think a rushed port to GTK+2 will help anybody achieve
> anything.
>
> given that gtk+1 is in sarge, and so must be supported to some extent
> until etch is released, it doesn't seem like there is going to be any
> extra work provided that the transition occurs before then.
It's not only Gtk 1 versus Gtk 2, Gnucash relies on the whole GNOME 1
stack of libraries. Removing Gtk 1 would concern many more packages.
Cheers,
--
Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>
Reply to: