I don't understand

To: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
Subject: I don't understand
From: Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo <jsogo@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 21:11:06 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20040523191105.GF3169@jaimedelamo.eu.org>
Mail-followup-to: debian-gtk-gnome@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0405232154520.11595-100000@hal.pp.fishpool.fi>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.58.0405231520410.3011@lea> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.21.0405232154520.11595-100000@hal.pp.fishpool.fi>

  1. Rythmbox is not part of GNOME 2.6
  2. In this case, what can be broken is Rythmbox, not GNOME 2.6
  3. If GNOME 2.6 is not uploaded to unstable, rythmbox won't be fixed
  (evil, dude)

  So, please, stop bitching about GNOME 2.6 not being ready using a
  related app with a problem which will be fixed by GNOME 2.6!!!!

-- 
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
   jsogo@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
  - From: Chipzz <chipzz@ULYSSIS.Org>
- Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
  - From: Martin-Éric Racine <q-funk@pp.fishpool.fi>

Prev by Date: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
Next by Date: numlockx: numlock is not activated if using gdm+gnome (#229038)
Previous by thread: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
Next by thread: Re: Keep non-gnome2.6 package out of the discussion please [was: GNOME 2.6 definitely not ready for unstable]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread