[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: confused



On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 17:00 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> I don't think that debian can/should package libgda 1.1, which libgdamm
> needs, because libgda 1.1 is an unstable set of release that is not
> parallel-installable with the stable libgda 1.0 series. Therefore,
> packaging it would risk breaking applications.
> 
> So, at the moment, it doesn't look like glom can be packaged until GNOME
> 2.8.0 comes out in approx 4 months, when I hope libgda 1.1/2.0 will
> become stable.

Of course this would not be a problem if debian unstable/testing was
being used as unstable, instead of being something that we are afraid to
break.

-- 
Murray Cumming
murrayc@murrayc.com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com



Reply to: