On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 18:40, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-01 at 17:00 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I don't think that debian can/should package libgda 1.1, which libgdamm
> > needs, because libgda 1.1 is an unstable set of release that is not
> > parallel-installable with the stable libgda 1.0 series. Therefore,
> > packaging it would risk breaking applications.
> >
> > So, at the moment, it doesn't look like glom can be packaged until GNOME
> > 2.8.0 comes out in approx 4 months, when I hope libgda 1.1/2.0 will
> > become stable.
>
> Of course this would not be a problem if debian unstable/testing was
> being used as unstable, instead of being something that we are afraid to
> break.
Maybe libgda1.1 should be packaged into experimental?
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com
jabber: ross@burtonini.com
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part