Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> writes:
> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 11:57:52PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
>> christophe barbe <christophe@cattlegrid.net> writes:
>>> What about providing reasons to keep it in the archive instead of asking
>>> (stupid) questions.
>> A package is no problem as long it has no release-critical bugs, so
>> there is no reason to remove it.
> Ok, but we need a bit of direction for not having the unsuspecting user
> install it thinking it is of good quality and well supported, when in
> fact it is not.
Software can be in a good shape *and* not be supported at the time (at
least very small applications like this). As long as it's useful for
some people, there's no reason to remove it or add "THIS IS NOT
MAINTAINED; GO AWAY AND USE SOMETHING ELSE" notices.
Marc
--
$_=')(hBCdzVnS})3..0}_$;//::niam/s~=)]3[))_$(rellac(=_$({pam(esrever })e$.)4/3*
)e$(htgnel+23(rhc,"u"(kcapnu ,""nioj ;|_- |/+9-0z-aZ-A|rt~=e$;_$=e${pam tnirp{y
V2ajFGabus} yV2ajFGa&{gwmclBHIbus}gwmclBHI&{yVGa09mbbus}yVGa09mb&{hBCdzVnSbus';
s/\n//g;s/bus/\nbus/g;eval scalar reverse # <mailto:marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>
Attachment:
pgp36EXSa2VU1.pgp
Description: PGP signature