[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable



Please move out this discussion to debian-devel and keep with topic of
this list.  Thank you!

O.

On Mon, 2004-04-19 at 11:21 -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> It's broke when your Woody server has 15 back ported packages (OpenLDAP,
> Samba, Postfix, Cyrus IMAP, Apache2, SpamAssassin, and there
> dependencies.)
> 
> On Sun, 2004-04-18 at 22:29 -0700, William Ballard wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 11:53:11PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > > It releases much more quickly than Debian, is fully compatible
> > > with Debian packages, and is a mix of testing/unstable, so that
> > > you'll get the latest and greatest.
> > 
> > Thanks, I just run Unstable.  Actually, I don't have any problem with 
> > Debian's philosophy of old as crap but stable, or yesterday's stuff with 
> > unstable.  I run unstable but surely if I ran any servers at home (I 
> > don't) I'd use stable.
> > 
> > It ain't broke.
-- 
Ondřej Surý <ondrej@sury.org>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: