Re: Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
> On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 01:14:40AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> > No. For sarge+1. Debian point releases are different.
> Well, I think you should consider changing that policy, called it "Sarge
> Second Edition" or something, unless you want to doom sarge from the
> start as "stable but old as dirt" like woody is.
> Unless you're hung up on dogma, there is no reason not to release a .1
> release in six months with a gnome refresh, *if* it has otherwise met
> the definition of "stable" in that time. (If not, then don't).
One word: Libranet.
It releases much more quickly than Debian, is fully compatible
with Debian packages, and is a mix of testing/unstable, so that
you'll get the latest and greatest.