Re: Upload of GNOME 2.6 to unstable
On Sun, Apr 18, 2004 at 01:14:40AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> No. For sarge+1. Debian point releases are different.
Well, I think you should consider changing that policy, called it "Sarge
Second Edition" or something, unless you want to doom sarge from the
start as "stable but old as dirt" like woody is.
Unless you're hung up on dogma, there is no reason not to release a .1
release in six months with a gnome refresh, *if* it has otherwise met
the definition of "stable" in that time. (If not, then don't).