On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 05:54:09AM -0800, Pete Shinners wrote: > i was thinking "abiword-gnome" should be preferred over straight > "abiword" as a dependency for the "gnome" and "gnome-office" > metapackages. up until recently i couldn't even print with the > non-gnome version, but i see in changelogs this has just been fixed. > if there was a "gtk-office" package i can see it preferring the > non-gnome edition. This was an oversight on my part. I didn't remember about abiword-gnome and dia-gnome when I created the gnome-office package. It was fixed last night, and will be ok when you upgrade today. > is this just "the way things are"? or did someone make a necessary > decision on how things need to be? is it worth filing a bug over? Sure, these things warrant bugs filed. If you find other issues, don't hesitate to bug me :) Jordi -- Jordi Mallach Pérez -- Debian developer http://www.debian.org/ jordi@sindominio.net jordi@debian.org http://www.sindominio.net/ GnuPG public key information available at http://oskuro.net/~jordi/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature