Re: libgtk+2.0/png3...are we or aren't we
Akira TAGOH <tagoh@debian.org> writes:
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Aug 2002 22:34:20 -0400 (EDT),
>>>>> "JH" == Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> wrote:
> JH> Can someone shed some light on what the plan is here? Are
> JH> we getting libgtk+ 2.0 rebuilt against png3 or not? If so I'll
> JH> rebuild my packages locally until the NMUs all work through
> JH> but I don't want to waste a bunch of time to find out after
> JH> I'm done that we are reverting to png2 after all. Thanks in
> JH> advance for any clarifications.
> I don't want to revert the dependency of GTK+2.0 to
> libpng2. because when I noticed this plan on this list,
> there are no objection about the shifting to libpng3. so I
> thought that I got the agreements.
And we should go forward, forget libpng2, the new version is libpng3.
Christian
Reply to: