Re: G2D problem with window managers
>>>>> On 05 Aug 2002 20:10:08 -0400,
>>>>> "CW" == Colin Walters <walters@debian.org> wrote:
CW> On Mon, 2002-08-05 at 17:53, Christian Marillat wrote:
>> FYI this priority is defined by the Policy. You can't increase this
>> priority for your convenience.
CW> Ugh. I consider that a bug in policy. It should allow more discretion
CW> for the individual maintainers.
CW> Or at least it should say something like "If the window manager complies
CW> with the Window Manager Specification Project, developed by the Free
CW> Desktop Group, then add 30 points."
That's make sense. we should offer the window manager which
is compliant the latest Window Manager Specification.
--
Akira TAGOH : tagoh@gnome.gr.jp / Japan GNOME Users Group
at@gclab.org : tagoh@gnome-db.org / GNOME-DB Project
: tagoh@redhat.com / Red Hat, Inc.
: tagoh@debian.org / Debian Project
Reply to: