Re: Gnome 2 summary 29/07/2002
On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 21:17, Chipzz wrote:
> You're being inconsistent. On one side you claim gnome2 should be in un-
> stable for testing, and on the other side you say broken apps should not
> be inthe packages (even though they could be tested then).
Actually I have advocated putting packages which are ready for use in
unstable, not everything which may or may not work. Being ready for use
does not imply it couldn't use testing.
--
Joe Drew <hoserhead@woot.net> <drew@debian.org>
"This particular group of cats is mostly self-herding." -- Bdale Garbee
Reply to: