Re: GNOME-2 transition: a first complaint
>> "MH" == Marek Habersack <grendel@debian.org> writes:
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2002 at 04:54:30AM -0700, Joseph Carter scribbled:
[...]
> The only thing I am worried about, for one, is the removal of many useful
> configuration options from things like sawfish, or the control-panel...
> Changing a window manager requires messing around with the alternatives
> system, making sawfish not show the window content requires writing Lisp
When you move a window ?
(setq resize-outline-mode 'box 'symbol)
(setq move-outline-mode 'box 'symbol)
> code (which is fine for me, as I know it but I helped some 5 people already
> to make that change...), same as making it wrap the workspace switching... I
> must say that I'm a bit disappointed with this aspect of GNOME2... It used
> to be so wonderfully configurable using the UI.
> My question is - are there any plans to make "advanced" interfaces for those
> control freaks who want to modify their configuration and not always have
> time to read the source or documentation (poor, as in the case of Sawfish)
> to achieve what they could do with GNOME1.4? Gconf For All(tm) would be
> sufficient, I believe :))
All the code has been removed in sawfish for GNOME 1.x and sawfish for
GNOME 2.x
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: