Re: Gnome 2 summary 27/06/2002
>> "CW" == Colin Walters <walters@debian.org> writes:
> On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 19:16, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>> So, I strongly agree with the earlier discussion that involved conflicting
>> package-name2 packages sitting alongside their package-name GNOME 1.x
>> friends in unstable.
> Well, I agree. A mass-renaming should not be too difficult, and I
> believe it will work.
> Christian (as the maintainer of most of GNOME 2): what do you think?
> Did you mean to upload gnome-terminal2 to unstable as "gnome-terminal"?
> If not, then you'll have to add an epoch and re-upload 1.4.
> If you did mean to do it, could you elaborate on your plans?
As I said in my first post, I'll keep all the core packages
(gnome-panel, gnome-applets, control-center, gnome-session) in
experimenatl, because those packages will break all applications who are
using an applet like gtm, gnomeicu, etc...
I've uploaded gnome-terminal and sawfish in unstable, because those two
packages are really better than the 1.x version and fix a lot of bugs.
Christian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gtk-gnome-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: