On Tue, 7 Feb 2023 at 08:22, Nilesh Patra <
nilesh@nileshpatra.info> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7 February 2023 1:30:00 pm IST, M Hickford <
mirth.hickford@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 at 18:34, Nilesh Patra <
nilesh@debian.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 08:00:00AM +0000, M Hickford wrote:
> >> > Hi. Would anyone here be able to please upload my package?
> >> >
> >
https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/git-credential-oauth/-/tree/debian/sid
> >>
> >> I have uploaded your package - 0.4.2 release. I'm not at all sure if you'd
> >> be willing to / would consider taking my feedback... but, anyway --
> >packages are
> >> usually uploaded when there are some more changes than just a few lines
> >> of minimal diffs.
> >> Not each and every patch release _has_ to get an upload. And so please do
> >> ping for uploads when you think there are some more changes than small
> >> fixes.
> >> But ofcourse, serious bugs (FTBFS, autopkgtest failures) and security bugs
> >> are important things so nothing of the what above I said applies to them.
> >
> >Thanks again Nilesh. I particularly wanted to get the future-proofing
> >customisation feature into bookworm, otherwise secret rotation could
> >have bricked the app.
>
> I did take a look at the diff and found it sensible to make an upload. As always, thanks for your work!
>
> >Isn't this a catch 22? To become a Debian Maintainer I need to
> >demonstrate an established "history of contributions" [1], but a potential
> >advocate
> >encourages me to make fewer contributions :-)
>
> There is not catch 22, and to be honest I do find that phrasing as borderline rude. I've two points to make
Sorry, I see how that came across. I apologise.
So my maintainer application is judged on contributions beyond the package(s) I want to maintain? I hoped to become maintainer for my simple leaf package before attempting anything more complex. Thanks for the suggestions, I'll take a look.