Re: LXD packages - feedback and suggestion related to lxd-agent and dnsmasq
Hi,
Thanks for those comments!
While I'm not directly involved with LXD packaging right now, this sounds like good suggestions. May I suggest you file bugs about those on LXD source package, maybe at wishlist severity (though I would set normal severity for dnsmasq depends, but again, not directly involved so not sure, there might be other reasons)?
It's easier to track this way. Even If it turns out it's not desirable to change those depends for some reason, it can always be closed or marked as wontfix, and it's more discoverable for others this way.
Cheers,
nodens
Le 1 décembre 2022 20:09:18 UTC, Sylvain Tgz <tarjaizaid@gmail.com> a écrit :
>Hello
>
>To get started, I would like to thank the team for the LXD package.
>
>I've just bootstrapped a bookworm install and played with LXD.
>Packages work fine, finally i didn't find any issue. Therefore, I
>would like to send my feedback and suggestions.
>
>- lxd-agent
>I think you should set lxd-agent in the recommended section instead suggested.
>I didn't see that you created a usefull wiki page with information and
>I spend some time to understand why VM didn't see lxd agent until I
>read lxd-agen description ;).
>With other virtualization solution we install the
>agent/addon/guesttool on the guest only. I think that a lot of user
>will discover LXD will have the same issue like me.
>
>- dnsmasq
>In my case, I manage LXD network by other tool but, dnsmasq is set as
>depends. I would like to be able to not install dnsmasq but in this
>case is not possible.
>I suggest to push dnsmasq as recommended. Some changes to the dpkg
>scripts seem necessary.
>
>Again, many thanks for these packages !
>
>Sylvain
>
--
nodens
Reply to: