[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#419467: Whoa, upstream wontfix?



On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:05:39PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 07:01:47PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 06:49:40PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > > The upgrade from etch->lenny should be safe provided people run/install
> > > a 2.6 kernel while still on etch, I am sure this will be prominently
> > > mentioned in the release announcement/release notes should this still be
> > > an issue by then.
> > 
> >   FWIW etch users should run 2.6 by now, hence the upgrade won't be
> > messy if they follow /etch/ release notes.  Remember that in /etch/
> > squid e.g. does not work if you don't have a 2.6 kernel.
> > 
> >   So yes, release notes will have to put in big red capital letters
> > "before anything else, upgrade to linux-image-2.6". Though, etch release
> > notes should stress that, not really lenny's.
> 
> That's right, but what about people who have always been running testing
> with a 2.4 kernel and have never seen (or were required to read, really,
> I guess) the etch release notes?

  then the libc will refuse to upgrade for them, too bad.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Attachment: pgpiOJo9a2m2n.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: