> > I think that your question should include the glibc maintainers, > > however I share your feelings. There is no point in maintaining > > belocs-* packages now....unless it again becomes difficult to include > > new locales in glibc. > > We basically agree to include locales fixes in the glibc if > corresponding native speakers agree with the changes, or in other words > in case of doubts we will ask on the l10n/i18n lists. > > The main problem we face is that, as far as I know, since Denis left > Debian, nobody has really the knowledge to do maintain the locales part > of the glibc. Somebody with such knowledge will be really welcome in the > team. Hmmm, let's hope that this will trigger vocations. In the meantime, I suggest that locales-related issues are CC'ed to -18n just like you suggested. As far as my knowledge goes, most people subscribed here are translators but some of them/us may have enough knowledge to help you out (though probably not the deep knowledge that Denis had on that topic). However, collectively, we probably can be of some help..:)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature