Re: Processed: libc bug appears to be dangerous for arm

To: Simon Law <sfllaw@debian.org>, GNU Libc Maintainers <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org>(libc6 #324795)
Subject: Re: Processed: libc bug appears to be dangerous for arm
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 17:35:22 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 81u0hfwx4l.wl%gotom@debian.or.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.s.C.11248527547465.transcript@bugs.debian.org>
References: <20050824030522.GP11564@law.yi.org> <[🔎] handler.s.C.11248527547465.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

At Tue, 23 Aug 2005 20:18:02 -0700,
Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> > severity 324795 critical
> Bug#324795: libc6 in stable broken on arm4vl
> Severity set to `critical'.

Why did you bump up severity of this report?  Do you have this problem
too?

Regards,
-- gotom

Reply to:

References:
- Processed: libc bug appears to be dangerous for arm
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#324550: Needs dependency fix [linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: install fails with "cannot stat `(0xffffe000)': No such file or directory"]
Next by Date: Bug#324795: libc6 in stable broken on arm4vl
Previous by thread: Processed: libc bug appears to be dangerous for arm
Next by thread: r1019 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . sysdeps
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread