[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

r1019 - in glibc-package/trunk/debian: . sysdeps



Author: gotom
Date: 2005-08-24 08:55:21 +0000 (Wed, 24 Aug 2005)
New Revision: 1019

Modified:
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
   glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl
Log:
    * debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl: Add Conflicts: e2fsprogs (<= 1.37-2sarge1)
      because new ldd cannot work with old e2fsprogs.  (Closes: #324550)



Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog	2005-08-23 04:16:39 UTC (rev 1018)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/changelog	2005-08-24 08:55:21 UTC (rev 1019)
@@ -31,6 +31,9 @@
     * debian/sysdeps/linux.mk: Check SETNJOBS environment variable to specify
       the number of parallel make by users.
 
+    * debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl: Add Conflicts: e2fsprogs (<= 1.37-2sarge1)
+      because new ldd cannot work with old e2fsprogs.  (Closes: #324550)
+
     * Michael Banck <mbanck@debian.org>:
       - debian/patches/glibc235-gcc4-hurd.dpatch: New file, to build glibc
         on Hurd with gcc-4.0.  (Closes: #324549)

Modified: glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl
===================================================================
--- glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl	2005-08-23 04:16:39 UTC (rev 1018)
+++ glibc-package/trunk/debian/sysdeps/depflags.pl	2005-08-24 08:55:21 UTC (rev 1019)
@@ -140,8 +140,10 @@
 # Replace libc-dev (<< 2.3.5-2) for fixing #280030.
 push @{$libc_dev_c{'Replaces'}}, "${libc}-prof (<< 2.3.5-2)";
 
-# Conflict old initrd-tools (<< 0.1.79) that cannot work with new ldd.
+# Conflict old initrd-tools (<< 0.1.79) and e2fsprogs (<= 1.37-2sarge1)
+# that cannot work with new ldd.
 push @{$libc_c{'Conflicts'}}, 'initrd-tools (<< 0.1.79)';
+push @{$libc_c{'Conflicts'}}, 'e2fsprogs (<= 1.37-2sarge1)';
 
 # Make sure we only have one version of libc-dev installed
 push @{$libc_dev_c{'Provides'}}, 'libc-dev';



Reply to: