[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#274756: marked as done (libc6: abort() breaks gdb backtraces with 2.6 kernel)



Your message dated Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:49:17 +0900
with message-id <81ekhmtvf6.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#274756: libc6: abort() breaks gdb backtraces with 2.6 kernel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2004 00:45:26 +0000
>From cras@oma.irssi.org Sun Oct 03 17:45:26 2004
Return-path: <cras@oma.irssi.org>
Received: from ip213-185-36-189.laajakaista.mtv3.fi (oma.irssi.org) [213.185.36.189] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1CEGyk-0005Dz-00; Sun, 03 Oct 2004 17:45:26 -0700
Received: by oma.irssi.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7BEFB300DF87C; Mon,  4 Oct 2004 03:45:23 +0300 (EEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libc6: abort() breaks gdb backtraces with 2.6 kernel
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.48
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:45:23 +0300
Message-Id: <20041004004523.7BEFB300DF87C@oma.irssi.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.2.ds1-16
Severity: important

Problem description:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2004-09/msg00162.html

and this didn't work:

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2004-09/msg00172.html

I think this is pretty important problem to any developers (especially when
receiving bugreports!). One of the major reasons why I last time went back
to 2.4 kernel. LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/debug helps, but it's annoying to
use.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.9-rc2-mm1-VP-S1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=fi_FI@euro

Versions of packages libc6 depends on:
ii  libdb1-compat                 2.1.3-7    The Berkeley database routines [gl

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 274756-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2004 10:49:18 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Sun Dec 19 02:49:18 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cfyco-0000sx-00; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 02:49:18 -0800
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5843EDEB3B; Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:49:17 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 19:49:17 +0900
Message-ID: <81ekhmtvf6.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Timo Sirainen <tss@iki.fi>, 274756-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#274756: libc6: abort() breaks gdb backtraces with 2.6 kernel
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1103432770.5048.3.camel@hurina>
References: <20041004004523.7BEFB300DF87C@oma.irssi.org>
	<81ekkfl21r.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
	<7D2B271D-15A3-11D9-9982-000393CC2E90@iki.fi>
	<20041004014941.GA18231@nevyn.them.org>
	<FA694E4A-15A8-11D9-9982-000393CC2E90@iki.fi>
	<20041004020432.GB18231@nevyn.them.org>
	<CD460680-15AA-11D9-9982-000393CC2E90@iki.fi>
	<20041101200954.GA24945@nevyn.them.org>
	<[🔎] 1103432770.5048.3.camel@hurina>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 274756-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Sun, 19 Dec 2004 07:06:10 +0200,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > In any case, it looks like we're removing -fomit-frame-pointer anyway.
> 
> Looks like it's done now, so maybe close this bug? It works with me
> again.

Ah, is this -fomit-frame-pointer issue?  Yes, it's now removed in -19.
Thanks for your notification - I can close it now.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: