[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#176080: marked as done (libc.so.6 has static non-PIC code linked in)



Your message dated Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:14:25 +0900
with message-id <81u0vo7wji.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
and subject line Bug#176080: libc.so.6 has static non-PIC code linked in
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2003 02:38:45 +0000
>From howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu Thu Jan 09 20:38:45 2003
Return-path: <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Received: from bromo.med.uc.edu (bromo.msbb.uc.edu) [129.137.3.146] 
	by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Wp45-0005BJ-00; Thu, 09 Jan 2003 20:38:33 -0600
Received: (from howarth@localhost)
	by bromo.msbb.uc.edu (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA86388
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:37:47 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:37:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
Message-Id: <200301100237.VAA86388@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libc.so.6 has static non-PIC code linked in
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: libc6
Version: 2.3.1-9

On debian ppc sid, the current /lib/libc-2.3.1.so appears to have
non-PIC static code linked in which is a violation of debian policy.

objdump --all-headers /lib/libc-2.3.1.so | grep TEXTREL
  TEXTREL     0x0

This appears to be unique to the debian glibc 2.3.1 build. Franz
Sirl's redhat based glibc 2.3.1 ppc rpms for glibc do not exhibit
this problem.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 176080-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2004 02:14:27 +0000
>From gotom@debian.or.jp Fri Jul 30 19:14:27 2004
Return-path: <gotom@debian.or.jp>
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (webmasters.gr.jp) [218.44.239.78] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BqjOF-0000b4-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:14:27 -0700
Received: from omega.webmasters.gr.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by webmasters.gr.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B4DD2DEB58; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:14:25 +0900 (JST)
Date: Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:14:25 +0900
Message-ID: <81u0vo7wji.wl@omega.webmasters.gr.jp>
From: GOTO Masanori <gotom@debian.or.jp>
To: Jack Howarth <howarth@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>,
	176080-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#176080: libc.so.6 has static non-PIC code linked in
In-Reply-To: <200301100237.VAA86388@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
References: <200301100237.VAA86388@bromo.msbb.uc.edu>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.9.9 (Unchained Melody) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya)
 FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2
 (i386-debian-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: 176080-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

At Thu, 9 Jan 2003 21:37:47 -0500 (EST),
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Package: libc6
> Version: 2.3.1-9
> 
> On debian ppc sid, the current /lib/libc-2.3.1.so appears to have
> non-PIC static code linked in which is a violation of debian policy.
> 
> objdump --all-headers /lib/libc-2.3.1.so | grep TEXTREL
>   TEXTREL     0x0
> 
> This appears to be unique to the debian glibc 2.3.1 build. Franz
> Sirl's redhat based glibc 2.3.1 ppc rpms for glibc do not exhibit
> this problem.

>   I can confirm now that glibc 2.3.2 eliminates the TEXTREL that
> shows up in recent (since at least 2.3.1-12?) glibc builds in libc.so.6
> on ppc sid. Using the current debian glibc 2.3.1-14 packaging and 
> patches with the release 2.3.2 tarballs I get a libc.so.6 that
> no longer shows a TEXTREL using...
> 
> objdump --all-headers ./libc.so.6 | grep TEXTREL
> 
> This fix doesn't appear to be related to changes in the devtools
> since the same debian ppc sid machine shows a TEXTREL in libc.so.6
> when rebuilding the current glibc-2.3.1-14 package.

Thanks for your checking.  Yes, I also confirmed it's deleted in
2.3.2.ds1-13.  I close this bug.

Regards,
-- gotom



Reply to: