Bug#219145: libc6.1-dbg: should provide libc-dbg
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 19:17, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> BTW, regardless of this bug, I think providing libc-dbg is useful for
> especially package selection. libc-pic, libc-udeb, libc-dev and libc
> are already provided. It's natural to provide libc-dbg.
>
> Jeff, any objections? I would add libc-dbg to the cvs.
Well, libc-udeb is supposed to be renamed to libc6-udeb as soon as Sarge
releases. =)
I think the provides is fine though.
Tks,
Jeff Bailey
Reply to: