Bug#219145: libc6.1-dbg: should provide libc-dbg
At Sat, 17 Apr 2004 09:00:47 +0900,
GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > as packager, i'd like to be able to choose whether or not libc-dbg
> > is required, recommended, suggested or whatever. if libc-dbg virtual
> > package does not exist i have no chance at all.
>
> Which package is it needed? Is recommending libc-dbg valuable for
> users? If there is not, I agree with Jeff's opinion.
Domenico, any reply with this bug? I think providing libc-dbg does
not make sense. Which package did you want to add libc-dbg?
If you have no object or reply, I'll close this bug.
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: