Re: 2.3.2-1
> > Well, this seems an idea, but still many bugs are remained in BTS.
> > Debian glibc stores up many bugs.
>
> So what? As long as they're known to be fixed by 2.3.2, what's the
> big deal? Stalling all of sarge for the sake of closing a bunch of
> bugs in one package seems like a stunningly pyrrhic victory to me.
>
It's not always _bugs_ that we're fighting. It's full out development.
Architectures not supported upstream have active development being
done within Debian/Others, which unfortuantely takes a lot of testing
and time.
c.
Reply to: