[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bugs triage?



On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:45:58PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > No, it's not buildd setup; it's the result of a glibc bug (#165456).
> > > that bug is closed... so is this not a problem anymore?
> > It remains a problem until all the miscompiled packages get reuploaded.
> Umm, but from glibc point of view, it was already fixed.

The glibc part of the problem is fixed, but other parts of the problem
remain unfixed. Some of those bugs got reassigned from other packages
to glibc, they probably need to be reassigned back if the package hasn't
already been fixed.

> Sending bug reports to such broken packages is more practical, don't you?

Since it was a broken glibc upload that caused the problem in the first
place, it'd make sense for the glibc guys to be the ones that make sure
it's fixed.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: pgpY8Wi3Hmkll.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: