[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: bugs triage?



On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 02:16:46PM -0800, Randolph Chung wrote:
> > >     * #167794: Wrong Pre-Depends
> > >       Package: libc6; Severity: critical; Reported by: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.org>; 25 days old.
> > > Looks like this might be a problem in the buildd setup? There's not
> > > enough information in the bug to say, and I'm not sure why this is
> > > assigned to glibc.
> > No, it's not buildd setup; it's the result of a glibc bug (#165456).
> that bug is closed... so is this not a problem anymore?

It remains a problem until all the miscompiled packages get reuploaded.
A version of sendmail broken in this manner made it into testing, causing
further problems. (This can be fixed by a source upload targetting at
testing and going into testing-proposed-updates, for reference)

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: pgpx21VGFgMUQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: