Bug#166414: apache: Apache non-functional after upgrade
At Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:09:32 +0000,
Tony Hoyle wrote:
> > Original reporter, Tony, please tell us whether your report is really
> > same bug #165699, #165718, and #165719, or not. If it seems to be same
> > (I also think), and #165699-#165719 is fixed, then I close this bug.
> >
> Not sure. Only Apache is broken, and if I downgrade libc6 I have to
> downgrade a lot of other packages that depend on it, which is a real
> pain (I have an 80% working system so far but haven't tracked down all
> the dependencies yet).
So, it's still vague that glibc or apache has a problem.
We want the evidence: it's a bug or not.
> I figured Apache just needed a recompile to work, which is why I filed
> the bug.
>
> From the looks of it this is *not* the same bug - does not die in
> strcmp (#165699), does not run up far enough to actually produce any
> output in the error/access logs (#165719). On testing it does appear to
> be php4 related though - php4 starts mallocing lots of 16 byte blocks of
> memory then segfaults.
>
> This is definately with 2.3.1-3 so is not fixed with that version. I
> have to downgrade to 2.2.5-15 before I can start apache (removing php is
> not an option).
If only recompilation resolve this problem, could I reassign this
bug to apache?
Regards,
-- gotom
Reply to: