[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: glibc 2.3 migration plans



Daniel,
     Ben accurately pointed out that this should be a Depends for
gcc 3.2 and not glibc since prelink requires glibc 2.3 which in
turn requires gcc 3.2. I have passed that on to Matthias. 
     On the otherhand, I am always of the mind that there is no
reason to build with a buggy binutils when you have a more correct
one available to you.
                   Jack



Reply to: